| 
 
  
  New!
 
Nanotech Scenario Series 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Join the  
conversation at
CRNtalk! 
  |  | Current Results of Our ResearchThese pages, marked with 
GREEN headings, are published for 
comment and criticism. These 
are not our final findings; some of these opinions will probably change.   
LOG OF UPDATES   CRN Research: Overview of Current Findings    
 
   Thirty Essential Nanotechnology Studies - #4Overview of all studies: Because of the largely 
unexpected transformational power of molecular manufacturing, it is urgent to 
understand the issues raised. To date, there has not been anything approaching 
an adequate study of these issues. CRN's recommended series of
thirty essential studies 
is organized into five sections, covering fundamental theory, possible 
technological capabilities, bootstrapping potential, product capabilities, and 
policy questions. Several preliminary conclusions are stated, and because our 
understanding points to a crisis, a parallel process of conducting the studies 
is urged.   CRN is actively looking for researchers interested in 
performing or assisting with this work. Please contact CRN Research Director
Chris Phoenix if you would like more information or if you have comments on 
the proposed studies.  
  
    | Study #4 | What 
    is the performance and potential of biological programmable manufacturing 
    and products? |  
    |  | Biology has been 
    making complex molecules and structures for billions of years, and 
    self-replicators already exist and produce cheap valuable products. Can this 
    be harnessed to produce engineered products? |  
    | Subquestion | Can the 
    rules of protein folding and self-assembly be accessed to design novel 
    proteins, structures, and machines? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Progress is 
    preliminary, but encouraging. A new protein fold has been designed and 
    tested. In "Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general 
    capabilities for molecular manipulation" (PNAS, 78(9), Sept. 1981), Drexler 
    pointed out that protein engineering should be much easier than solving the 
    protein folding problem for natural proteins. |  
    | Subquestion | Can 
    intracellular transport mechanisms be adapted to increase the 
    programmability of part assembly? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Biological motors 
    have been extracted from cells and made to run. Programmability would depend 
    on whether some way other than diffusing chemicals could be found to power 
    them. |  
    | Subquestion | How 
    efficiently can new genetic specifications be synthesized and transferred 
    into cells? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Progress is being 
    made... Study the cost per nucleotide vs. time. Also look at plasmid and 
    artificial chromosome development. |  
    | Subquestion | Can the 
    rules of multicellular structure formation (analogous to ontology or 
    cellular specialization) be accessed to design larger products? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Good question. MIT 
    work on amorphous computing may be relevant. |  
    | Subquestion | What would 
    be the performance of engineered systems based on biological materials, with 
    or without augmented biochemistry? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Strength: perhaps 
    comparable to modern polymers. Computation: with augmented chemistry, could 
    include molecular electronics. This depends largely on covalent bond 
    density. |  
    | Subquestion | What would 
    be the production speed of a biology-based manufacturing system? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Unknown. |  
    | Subquestion | What is the 
    smallest size (genome and physical) of a viable cell? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Unknown. |  
    | Subquestion | Can 
    extracellular protein synthesis systems improve any of these answers? |  
    | Preliminary answer | Unknown. |  
    | Conclusion | More research will be needed to tell whether this technology can be 
    revolutionary, but it looks promising so far. 
 |  
    | Other studies | 1. 
    Is 
    mechanically guided chemistry a viable basis for a manufacturing technology? 2. To what extent is molecular manufacturing counterintuitive and 
    underappreciated in a way that causes underestimation of its importance?
 3. What is 
    the performance and potential of diamondoid machine-phase chemical 
    manufacturing and products?
 
 5. What is the performance and potential of nucleic acid 
    manufacturing and products?
 6. What other chemistries and options should be studied?
 7. What 
    applicable sensing, manipulation, and fabrication tools exist?
 8. What will be required to develop diamondoid machine-phase chemical 
    manufacturing and products?
 9. What will be required to develop biological programmable 
    manufacturing and products?
 10. What will be required to develop nucleic acid manufacturing and 
    products?
 11. How rapidly will the cost of development decrease?
 12. How could an effective development program be structured?
 13. What is 
    the probable capability of the manufacturing system?
 14. How capable will the products be?
 15. What will the products cost?
 16. How rapidly could products be designed?
 17. Which 
    of today's products will the system make more accessible or cheaper?
 18. What new products will the system make accessible?
 19. What impact will the system have on production and distribution?
 20. What effect will molecular manufacturing have on military and 
    government capability and planning, considering the implications of arms 
    races and unbalanced development?
 21. What effect will this have on macro- and microeconomics?
 22. How can proliferation and use of nanofactories and their products 
    be limited?
 23. What effect will this have on policing?
 24. What beneficial or desirable effects could this have?
 25. What effect could this have on civil rights and liberties?
 26. What are the disaster/disruption scenarios?
 27. What effect could this have on geopolitics?
 28. What policies toward development of molecular manufacturing does 
    all this suggest?
 29. What policies toward administration of 
    molecular manufacturing does all this suggest?
 30. How can appropriate policy be made and implemented?
 
 |  
    | Studies should begin 
    immediately. | The situation is 
    extremely urgent. The stakes are unprecedented, and the world is unprepared. 
    The basic findings of these studies should be verified as rapidly as 
    possible (months, not years). Policy preparation and planning for 
    implementation, likely including a crash development program, should begin 
    immediately. |  DEVIL'S ADVOCATE — 
Submit your criticism, please! (Sorry, no one has complained about this page yet, and we 
  couldn't think of anything to write. Please  
  contact us 
  with your questions, criticisms, and other suggestions.) 
 
 |